Breakaway Impact Registry
Lineus Medical Logo

SafeBreak Registry Clinical ReportBreakaway Impact Registry Results

SIH Carbondale Hospital Clinical Dashboard

EnrolledSafeBreak Enrolled
148
Control Enrolled
340
SafeBreak Separation Rate
19.6%
SafeBreak Complication Rate
8.1%
Control Complication Rate
31.2%
Complication Rate Reduction
74%
CLINICALCLINICAL RESULTS
Active Filters
PIV-only records are shown.
Summary
Metric SafeBreak Group
N (%)
Control Group
N (%)
Aggregate SafeBreak Data
N (%)
Aggregate Control Data
N (%)
Enrollment148340
Separations29 (19.6%)
Cohort IV Complications12 (8.1%)106 (31.2%)
Outcome Improvement Metrics
Metric SafeBreak Group
N (%)
Control Group
N (%)
Aggregate SafeBreak Data
N (%)
Aggregate Control Data
N (%)
Absolute Risk Reduction23.1%
Relative Risk Reduction74.0%
Risk Ratio (RR)0.26
Number Needed to Treat4.3
Complication Types
Type Aggregate Control Data
N (%)
Aggregate SafeBreak Data
N (%)
Aggregate Complication Reduction
Dislodgement
Infiltration
Leaking
Occlusion
Phlebitis
All Complications
Cause of Separation
Cause SafeBreak Group
N (%)
Control Group
N (%)
Unknown19 (50%)
Pulled by Patient on purpose15 (39%)
Alligator Roll by Patient1 (3%)
Laying on tubing1 (3%)
Patient Transfer (bed to bed)1 (3%)
Tubing trapped in hospital bed/rail1 (3%)
Note: Cause of separation may be multi-select; percentages may exceed 100%.
Statistical Comparison of IV Complication Rates
Metric Value P-value Significance
Two-proportion z-test-5.51<0.000001Highly Significant
Fisher exact testConfirmed<0.000001Highly Significant
Chi-square test30.3<0.0001Significant
SafeBreak Admission Diagnosis by Therapeutic Indication
Therapeutic Indication N %
Gastrointestinal / Hepatobiliary1520.8%
Orthopedic / Trauma / Musculoskeletal1419.4%
Infectious Disease / Sepsis1115.3%
Respiratory79.7%
Neurologic79.7%
Missing/Not Documented68.3%
Other / General Medical56.9%
Renal / Urologic45.6%
Cardiovascular34.2%
Replacement Time Difference
(SafeBreak vs. IV)
Dwell Time Difference
(SafeBreak vs. Control)
Hospital Stay Difference
(SafeBreak vs. Control)
Catheter Ratio Difference
(SafeBreak vs. Control)
OPERATIONALOPERATIONAL RESULTS
Active Filters
PIV-only records are shown.
Working Metrics
Metric SafeBreak Group
N
Control Group
N (%)
Aggregate SafeBreak Data
N (%)
Aggregate Control Data
N (%)
Replacement Time, Minutes4.621.7
Dwell Time, Hours64.958.1
Hospital Length of Stay, Hours69.674.4
Catheter-to-Patient Ratio
Access Preservation
Metric SafeBreak Group
N
Control Group
N
Aggregate SafeBreak Data
N
Aggregate Control Data
N
Separations or Control Complications29106
New IV Required656
New IV Not Required / Access Preserved2350
Access Preservation Rate, 95% CI79.30%47.20%
$
Estimated Annual Net Direct Savings per Hospital
$48,902
Return on Investment (ROI)
130%
Estimated Annual Complications Avoided per Hospital
1,614
Estimated Annual Bed Hours Preserved per Hospital
33,547 hours
Estimated Annual Nursing Hours Preserved per Hospital
3,495 hours
ECONOMICALECONOMIC RESULTS
Active Filters
PIV-only records are shown.
Annual IV Restart Cost Avoidance
Metric SafeBreak Group vs Control Assumption / Calculations Aggregate SafeBreak Data Aggregate Control Data
Annual IV Catheter assumption6,989Assumption of 112 Beds
Estimated complications avoided1,6146,989 × 31.2% = 2,181 expected complications − 6,989 × 8.1% = 566 expected SafeBreak complications
Estimated IV Restarts Avoided2,0642,181 expected control restarts − 117 expected SafeBreak restarts (20.7%) = 2,064 IV restarts avoided
Estimated Ultrasound guided IV Restarts26813% based on average required ultrasound in control data
Estimated PIV restart1,796Complications avoided − ultrasound guided
Metric SafeBreak Group vs Control Assumption / Calculations Aggregate SafeBreak Data Aggregate Control Data
Hard cost + Nursing Time per Ultrasound guided restart$28,754268 × ($43.21 + ($21.36 × 3)) = 268 × $107.29
Hard cost + Nursing Time per PIV restart$57,764(2,064 + (2,064 × 31%)) = 2,704 attempts × $21.36
Gross direct cost avoidance$86,518$28,754 + $57,764
SafeBreak devices used assumption + Separation Rate8,359Projected IV Catheter assumption + 6,989 × 1.196
Assumed SafeBreak device cost$4.90Device cost assumption
Estimated device investment$40,9598,359 × $4.90

SafeBreak Registry Clinical Report - DEMO 2

ALL HOSPITAL DATA

Enrolled
575
Average Complication Reduction
87.6%
Estimated Savings per Hospital
$786K
Average Complication Rate
5.0%
ALL HOSPITAL DATA Key Summary
  • 9 of the 10 separations were infusing medication at time of separation with only 2 (20%) needing IV restart
  • 80% of events did not need product or supply changes
  • SafeBreak saved on average 17.5 minutes for time to replace a SafeBreak vs time to restart IV
  • Nurse overall satisfaction score was 9.6 out of 10
Clinical Outcomes
Financial Outcomes
Operational Outcomes
SafeBreak Vascular Registry - Sanford eCRF V2

SafeBreak® Vascular Registry

A Breakaway Device for All Vascular Access Lines

Please select the form section that matches the data you need to enter. Registration information only needs to be completed once for each patient. Event information should be completed when a SafeBreak® separation and/or vascular access complication occurs.
Patient Information
Last three numbers of Medical Record Number.
First, Middle, Last. If the middle is unknown use “-”.